AI · Decision support
Irizium
An AI-assisted perspective and resolution platform that turns messy disagreements into structured cases.
“The internet's courtroom.”
Visit live site(opens in a new tab)Overview
Irizium takes an emotional, unstructured disagreement and gives it a shape: a case, submissions from each side, and reasoning you can read line by line. Instead of presenting a single AI opinion as truth, it deliberately invites several reasoning styles into the room.
It is a perspective and decision-support product. It is explicitly not legal advice, and it is designed so that no case ever becomes a public spectacle.
Why it exists
Most everyday disputes are never really heard. They get louder voices, group chats and unresolved feelings — and a single confident answer from a chatbot rarely helps.
Separating judgement into distinct viewpoints — logic, empathy and challenge — makes the reasoning visible, so a person can weigh it, argue with it, or set it aside.
What’s evolving
- Solo Perspective
- Instant Decision
- Appeals & added context
Key experience
- 01
Two-party remote cases
Each side submits their account privately, so the verdict responds to the actual dispute rather than to whoever tells the story first or best.
- 02
Solo Perspective and Instant Decision
Solo Perspective is for one person seeking clarity on their own situation. Instant Decision handles lighter A/B calls that only need a quick, reasoned nudge.
- 03
An AI Judge and three jurors
The Rationalist weighs facts and consistency, The Empath reads intent and feeling, The Devil's Advocate pressure-tests the popular answer. The Judge synthesises a majority verdict.
- 04
Adaptive questioning and neutral summaries
The case asks for what is missing rather than a fixed form, then restates both positions neutrally before any reasoning begins.
- 05
Additional context, appeals and direct questions
Submit Additional Context to reopen a case, file an appeal when something was missed, or question any juror individually about their reasoning.
- 06
Private by default
Cases are private, submissions are not exposed to the other party's edit history, and nothing is built for public shaming.